assured a Calcutta audience, the besetting sin of Indians, Gokhale had none of it. He had no rhetoric. He cared nothing for impassioned language and magnificent periods. I have never heard a calmer or more self-restrained speaker. His was the eloquence of perfect knowledge, of entire devotion to his cause, and utter regardless of self or any other consideration. What he said of Ranade, was true of himself; "It was as though the first person singular did not exist in his vocabulary". But, however quiet his speech, the courage of unyielding conviction and of that regardlessness of self or fortune or applause was always felt behind it. It needs some bravery to continue insisting on the same cause year after year with hardly any apparent result. Courage underlying a sweet reasonableness was the characteristic of the man and of his speaking. It made him a speaker of singular attraction and lucidity. But he was never satisfied with words. He knew how easily reformers are beguiled into believing that when speeches have been made, something has been accomplished. He knew that speeches accomplish nothing unless action follows, and with this knowledge he founded the "Servants of India." Courage, self-assertion and discipline in public life were the qualities which he found wanting and which he hoped to develop through the Congress and such missionary means as his Order of Servants. He knew it would be a slow work. He recognised the obstacles on the side of the Government and on the side of his own people.
I had known Mr. Gokhale for 25 years as one who placed healthy and decisive limitations to his ambition. He had a balanced intellect and studied both sides of the subject too well to take extreme views. He regarded the late Mr.