पान:वैदिक तत्वमीमांसा.pdf/19

शंकराचार्य आणि रामानुजाचार्य १३ जर स्वतंत्रपणे विचार केला, तर त्याचा एक अर्थ होतो; परंतु जर तो ग्रंथ कॅटच्या मुख्य उद्देशाचा केवळ एक भाग व्यक्त करितो असे मानले तर त्याच ग्रंथाचा अर्थ भिन्न होतो. आणि हा एकंदरीत किंवा मुख्य उद्देश कॅटच्या मनामध्ये आरंभापासून स्थूलरूपाने तरी होता. मात्र सोयी करिता एका मागून एक असे ग्रंथ लिहून त्याने तो उद्देश सिद्धीला नेला.' ( And there can be no doubt that passages may be easily quoted in support of each of these views, seeing that the task of Kant is a very complex one, and what appears as an end from one point of view, or in relation to one part of his philosophy taken by itself, becomes in turn a means when we contemplate that part in its relations to other parts. The different sections of the Critique have thus & proximate purpose, different from that which is the aim of the whole treatise; and that treatise gets a different meaning according as we contemplate it as a whole in itself, or as a part of a wider plan which from the first was present to Kant's mind, at least in its main outlines, though for convenience he executed it in a Series of successive treatises, I. 228.), आणि हा नियम ग्रंथकारांनी आपले विचार व्यक्त कर एमासाठीं योजिलेल्या भाषेचा अर्थ करितांनाच नव्हे, तर